An Inconvenient Truth Argument

Mr. Al Gore who used to be the next president of the USA introduced the movie An Inconvenient Truth. This movie shows us how the Global Warming effected our environment in the past years and in the next 50 year where the effects will be. Although in my opinion, this issue is not one of the popularity but based on simple fact. Now I’ll outline the argument between negative and positive reviews.



At first I will deal with the negative review. Some scientists disagree with Mr. Al Gore in the rise of temperature because of CO. Scientist Patterson said that in 450 million years ago, the C level was 10 times higher than now however the Earth was in coldest period. Mr. Al Gore linked between the hurricanes and the global warming and Dr. William Gray said that is not true. At the end of the movie, more scare pictures and scenarios had come over therefore the movie lost the trustiness. (Behreandt)



On the other hand is the positive review. Global warming is true and this movie convinced million of people who don’t believe this issue to believe it. Melting of the glaciers and the movement of polar bars are the sign that the climate is getting warm year after another and many of scientists and environmentalists proof the reality of global warming. This documentary movie warns us and if we didn’t take a real action, many things in the world will change forever. (Sherman)



In conclusion I think that this movie is excellent because it shows us lot of things that we don’t know and how the global warming will affect our life if we didn’t take serious action. We must look for another source powers which will reduce the atmospheric temperature.



Bibliography:

Behreandt, Dennis. "Hot air." Hot air. 18 Oct. 2007. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-21140267_ITM>.



Sherman, Ted. "Movie reviews: An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.helium.com/items/249578-movie-reviews-an-inconvenient-truth.